tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3633340492414786737.post1904111448910505963..comments2023-03-05T03:19:52.517-08:00Comments on WADAwatch: WADA concept: good SciencemanshipZENmud productionshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07520070316585915774noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3633340492414786737.post-64229786939575085662010-01-15T19:06:25.146-08:002010-01-15T19:06:25.146-08:00Anon,
Forgive me, it was a week ago you submitte...Anon, <br /><br />Forgive me, it was a week ago you submitted this same comment, and it is the one I just posted today, because I've been moving intercontintally, from GVA to Denver... <br /><br />Your point reinforces mine, and shows WADA that they are facing a world of sports fans that are growing increasingly aware of 'chinks' and 'cracks' in the WADA system. A system ZENmud productionshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07520070316585915774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3633340492414786737.post-58895353306040466272010-01-08T13:17:43.663-08:002010-01-08T13:17:43.663-08:00Thanks for the response. I'd be curious to se...Thanks for the response. I'd be curious to see the data that justified more than 1 Metabolite requirement in the US, etc. and then compare that analysis with LNDD's justification of only 1. <br /><br />The other point that bugs me. The technicians admitted in the trial they knew who they were testing. Why wouldn't the tester be provided some anonymous control samples in the mix.. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3633340492414786737.post-14957156482447328202010-01-06T10:21:49.568-08:002010-01-06T10:21:49.568-08:00Hi and thanks for your comment: I'm hoping my ...Hi and thanks for your comment: I'm hoping my buddy Jon is reading this also, as he's the scientific analyst I trust... but I will address this one sentence of yours:<br />"Any chance that going forward there will be a better statistical understanding of the 1 vs 2 vs 3 Metabolite concern?"<br /><br />I'll answer the legal side... or the 'international regulatory' ZENmud productionshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07520070316585915774noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3633340492414786737.post-90940971914285369542010-01-04T14:09:24.832-08:002010-01-04T14:09:24.832-08:00On the control tests that we know are positive. A...On the control tests that we know are positive. Any chance that going forward there will be a better statistical understanding of the 1 vs 2 vs 3 Metabolite concern? Ie. it is determined that in fact, it is possible to have 1 Metabolite false-positive (say 1 out of 20 times) or that 99.9% of all true positive tests conducted "always" have 2+ Metabolites. Wouldn't that data be a Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com